Blog Assignment #1

What is epistomology?

A formal definition of the word is, "a philosophical branch of study that seeks to define what knowledge is and how you can come to know".  This is something that I personally have never thought about.  I always figured that when you come to know something, it becomes natural and it doesn't require much thought after that to arrive at  conclusions.  Example:  2+2=4.  I just KNOW that is what it is and don't have to think about it much.  In relation to aviation, an example could be the fact that by pulling back on the yoke, the aircraft will pitch up.  It is knowledge to me because it comes naturally and doesn't require too many brain cells to achieve the desired outcome. 

Constructivist vs. Positivist

I'll begin with the positivist.  This type of epistemology deals with facts and how they are divided up or "blocked" into packets of information.  It is disseminated to the students by degrees and is learned in sort of a pyrimid style beginning with the basics and ramping up (if the students goes far enough in the field) to where he can become an "expert" in the chosen field of study.  Although the student may have knowledge in many fields, he can only claim expertise in this particular field because of the learning structure.

A constructivist on the other hand deals more with the use of the information gained rather than rote regurgitation.  It requires that the student gives meaning to the data that is presented so that it will be useful to him. 

Which type do I identify with?

I think that I am a positivist type learner.  I am an analytical, left-brained type weirdo that actually enjoys things like math and physics.  I prefer to hear a lecture, then study it out on my own.  I have to admit I like the organization and stability of the positivist approach.  I like knowing what to expect I guess.